It should
be made clear, however, that the computer cannot totally replace the teacher
since the teacher shall continue to play information deliverer and learning
environment controller.
DISCUSSION:
1.
Do you believe CAI in some future time can replace teachers in the
classroom?
Ø No.
2.
Since it is admitted that CAI relate to lower learning skills
(behaviorist and cognitivist learning), what grade levels would CAI
drill-and-practice software materials be useful? Do you think those in college
will still want drill-and-practice learning activities that provide plain
memorization (behaviorism) and brain processing like a mere computer
(cognitivism)?
Ø In will be in the Primary
and secondary levels.
3.
What problem can be encountered if a school (such as in poor countries)
cannot afford to provide enough computers to students? Will CAI work at all
with a whole school using single computer?
Ø No, single computer will not
work in the whole school even though they use projector because the student
will not be interested anymore if that will happened because we all know that
student want to explore and experience new things, that’s’ why CAI will not
work if there will be only one computer in a school.
4.
What can the school neighborhood community or non-government
organizations do to put public schools on a fast track for the integration of
technology in public education?
Ø If they are really wanted
the fast track for the integration of technology in public education, they
should have the unity and ask for help or submit a proposal to the government
for assistance for integration of the public schools.
The
computer is a tutor in this new age of learning. It does not replace the
teacher, although it assumes certain roles previously assigned to teacher who
now has to take the new role of facilitator and guide.
Computer
activities are not the end-all of learning since they have to conform to the
lessons/curriculum.
Computers
will become an integral component of the future classroom and not a mere
machine that can deliver routine drills and exercises.
DISCUSSION:
1.
Many software materials available in developed countries are not yet
available in developing countries. Do you think awareness of the existence of
these materials can still help teachers in developing countries?
Ø Yes, because this teacher
will work hard so that they will be more competitive even though some materials
do not yet exist in their places.
2.
Students play games at home and nearby school computer cafés. How do
these games differ from instructional computer games?
Ø Computer games are games
that student play when they are bored and they want only for entertainment. And
the Instructional computer games, are game usually played by student if they
want to improved their abilities and skill in a specific area. And mostly it is
played by low achieving learners to improvethere thinking skills.
3.
Discuss the difficulties of using software: number of school computers
available, need to evaluate these software materials, need to find ways to
integrate them into lessons/curriculum. How futuristic are computers as tutors
in our Philippine educational scenario?
Ø It is difficult to use
software if there is only one computer available in a school, if the teachers
also do not know how to manipulate the computer and if the connection is very
fair.
Ø It will be successful,
because we all know that the Philippines is a developing country and most of
the school have connection in the internet that we can use to access some
international information that will help us in our need mostly in computer
tutoring.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento